In the highly regulated pharmaceutical industry, Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) are non-negotiable. Analytical Method Validation is the formal, systematic process that proves the reliability and suitability of every test used to examine drug products.
Regulatory authorities worldwide place particular emphasis on validation. It formally demonstrates that an assay method or analytical technique provides satisfactory, consistent, and useful data to ensure product safety and efficacy.
What is Analytical Method Validation (AMV)?
Validation is the procedure established through laboratory studies that confirms the performance characteristics of an analytical method meet the necessary requirements for its intended application.
Modern Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) require that quality be built into the product from the start, rather than relying solely on final product testing. AMV ensures that the analytical techniques used to test these products have the required quality attributes built directly into them.
While validation can be a time-consuming activity, it ultimately results in cost savings, eliminates frustrating repetitions, and leads to better time management in the long run.
When is Analytical Method Validation Required?
An analytical method must be validated or revalidated in the following scenarios:
- Before initial use in routine analysis.
- When a method is transferred from one laboratory to another.
- Whenever the method parameters or conditions for which the technique was approved change and fall outside the original scope.
- When a method is modified (e.g., if a new contaminant is discovered that compromises the method's specificity).
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Validation
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is one of the most preferred and widely used analytical techniques in pharmaceutical laboratories today.
HPLC is a sophisticated form of liquid chromatography that uses small particle columns and high pressure to separate components. Its popularity stems from its ability to deliver:
- Rapid analysis
- High sensitivity
- High resolution
- Easy sample recovery
- Precise and reproducible results
Validation of HPLC methods is a critical task, ensuring the technique reliably measures the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API), impurities, and degradation products.
Related: Understanding the Principle of HPLC and the Steps for HPLC Method Development.
The Validation Process: A Collaborative Effort
Successful analytical method validation requires cooperative efforts from several departments, including Quality Control, Quality Assurance, Regulatory Affairs, and Analytical Development.
A well-planned process is crucial. The essential steps for a complete assay method validation are:
1. Validation Protocol
This is a comprehensive document detailing the company's approach to the validation of analytical procedures. It ensures consistent and efficient execution of validation projects and serves as the primary reference during regulatory audits.
2. Revalidation
Necessary whenever a method is significantly changed, especially if a new parameter falls outside the specified operating range. For impurity tests, revalidation is needed if the method's specificity is compromised by a newly discovered contaminant.
Core Analytical Validation Parameters (Per ICH Guidelines)
The analytical methods requiring validation are classified according to ICH Guidelines (International Council for Harmonisation). The validation parameters used depend on the intended purpose of the assay:
| Method Type | Primary Validation Focus |
| Identification Tests | Selectivity/Specificity (to ensure identity) |
| Quantitative Analysis for Impurities | Specificity, Limit of Quantitation, Accuracy, Linearity, Range |
| Limit Test for Impurities | Specificity, Limit of Detection |
| Assay of Drug Substance/Product | Specificity, Accuracy, Precision, Linearity, Range |
Key Validation Parameters Explained:
- Selectivity and Specificity: The ability of the method to accurately measure the analyte in the presence of other components (e.g., impurities, degradants, matrix).
- Linearity: The method’s ability to produce test results directly proportional to the analyte concentration over a defined range.
- Range: The interval between the upper and lower concentrations for which the method has demonstrated acceptable accuracy, precision, and linearity.
- Accuracy: The closeness of agreement between the value obtained by the method and the accepted true value (often assessed by recovery studies of spiked samples).
Precision: The closeness of agreement among a series of measurements obtained from multiple samplings of the same homogeneous specimen.
- Repeatability (Intra-assay precision): Precision under the same operating conditions over a short time interval.
- Limit of Detection (LOD): The lowest amount of analyte in a sample that can be detected, but not necessarily quantified (often based on a signal-to-noise ratio).
- Limit of Quantification (LOQ): The lowest amount of analyte that can be quantitatively determined with acceptable accuracy and precision.
.webp)
%20Web%20of%20pharma%20.webp)
.webp)
